?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Shall we Debate? [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
F-SD

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

TH can live with a nuclear North Korea (OVERDUE) [Jan. 31st, 2007|07:14 am]
F-SD

austere_flare
I rusty 'cause I no training. And...time pressure. I leave for DLSU in a while for an interview (will be excused from morning classes).

(WHY DOES IDEA CROP UP WHEN MY SCHEDULE IS AT ITS BUSIEST?!)

linkpost comment

Hello! IDeA 2nd invites sched [Dec. 31st, 2006|08:55 pm]
F-SD

pepitaluna
I hate to ruin your New Year but I have to post the schedule for the next IDeA :| Sorry.


STC, January 13-14



Maybe you would like to train as soon as we get back?


::♥::


Shall Post My Homework soon. :| Gomen!
linkpost comment

Rusty me! XP [Dec. 3rd, 2006|06:14 am]
F-SD

icy_flares
[Tags|, , , ]
[Current Location |Typing really fast on the computer]
[mood |workingworking]
[music |Motherland --> Crystal Kay]

Sorry it took me a while to do this.. but mind you... I'M RUSTY...


Here's the opp one... XD this is just as bad as the other one -__-
Sorry ate tet... really rusty... will have to attend trainings! O_O
linkpost comment

NoKor: PM speech outline [Nov. 29th, 2006|02:13 pm]
F-SD

angular_angles
[mood |blankblank]

TH can live with a nuclear North Korea

(so far, this is the best idea i have, if i can think of something better, then i shall post...)

CONTEXT: (i am trying) to set this in western nations specifically US which is a major proponent in opposing north korea's production of nuclear weapons

DEFINITION: can live- the act would be fine and can be permitted
nuclear- producing nuclear weapons
North Korea- (apart from china), this is another communist country in east asia
***so, we are arguing on the possibility of giving north korea the permission to continue in its production of nuclear weapons

ISSUE: western hypocrisy wherein there is an impetus on singling- out north korea while western power, US has also produced and tested nuclear weapons. (see http://www.mathaba.net/0_index.shtml?x=544284)

STANCE: the government side would like to give north korea the permission to produce and test weapons and will not sanction them as US utilized such power but was not sanctioned. (?and also propose that in testing, location must be measured accurately to ensure that it will not cause harm?)
why proposal will work and north korea will not attempt to destroy a country with nukes: deterrence/to avoid retaliation

*ARGUMENT/S TO FOLLOW*

**Suggested topics to concept map/discuss next week:
1. outsourcing 2. 2008 olympics?

:->anna
linkpost comment

(no subject) [Nov. 20th, 2006|05:56 pm]
F-SD

stresstabs
is it just me or this place is reeking of inactivity? please do your old North Korea homework. let's all be civil here and help each other get better at debating. i know you guys are busy, but debate isnt like the tap you can turn on and off and expect to be good at. :) we need to work harder!

ganbatte kudasai! (^__^)v


t.
linkpost comment

North Korea lecture [Nov. 8th, 2006|04:45 pm]
F-SD

stresstabs
hullo kids. :)

hope you "enjoyed" (i use the term loosely, okay?) our little North Korea lecture. we could've discussed more, but i'm hoping we've sacrificed quantity for comprehensiveness and depth. :p any more questions on the matter are welcome, just reply to this. let's keep the community active.

also, if anyone of you is bored (uh), and can perhaps make a digital rendition (even a .jpg file maybe? or on word/powerpoint) of the concept map, that'd be nice. i noticed some people got a little messed up while taking notes so that'd be a huge help to them too. :)

i'll be uploading friday's lecture's concept map tomorrow night. :) please download and print for class.

more importantly, notice that while we were concept-mapping, we more or less were forming ideas readily transformable to arguments. however, a word of caution: while matter creates a good groundwork for strong arguments, the way you handle the wide expanse of matter you have on any topic determines your efficacy as debaters. matter, to be effective, must be well-integrated into the analysis and not used tokenistically in argumentation.

the homework, again, is to casebuild for both gov and opp the motion: TH can live with a nuclear North Korea. will post my debate notes on this in a bit. :)
link3 comments|post comment

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]